Huggingface Leaderboard

You are currently viewing Huggingface Leaderboard

Huggingface Leaderboard

Huggingface Leaderboard

Huggingface, a popular natural language processing library, provides a leaderboard that ranks various models and datasets based on their performance in NLP tasks. This leaderboard serves as a valuable resource for researchers and developers in the NLP community, allowing them to compare and select the most appropriate models for their specific applications. With contributions from a diverse range of users, the Huggingface leaderboard is constantly updated with the latest advancements in NLP research, ensuring that users have access to state-of-the-art models.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Huggingface Leaderboard ranks models and datasets based on their performance in NLP tasks.
  • It serves as a valuable resource for researchers and developers in the NLP community.
  • The leaderboard is updated regularly with the latest advancements in NLP research.
  • Users can compare and select the most appropriate models for their specific applications.

The Huggingface leaderboard encompasses a wide range of NLP tasks such as text classification, question answering, and named entity recognition. Each task has its own set of evaluated models and datasets listed on the platform. By evaluating these models using standardized evaluation metrics, the leaderboard provides an objective and comparative analysis of their performance. Researchers and developers can conveniently access these evaluations, allowing them to choose the most effective models for their NLP projects.

Huggingface’s commitment to providing up-to-date evaluations makes it one of the most trusted sources for NLP model comparison and selection.

Table 1: Top 5 Text Classification Models

Rank Model Accuracy
1 BERT 0.92
2 RoBERTa 0.91
3 DistilBERT 0.89
4 GPT-2 0.88
5 XLNet 0.87

One of the main advantages of the Huggingface leaderboard is the diversity of available models. Users can find models based on different architectures, pre-training techniques, and generalization abilities. In addition to the evaluations, the leaderboard provides comparison charts that illustrate the performance of multiple models on various NLP tasks. These charts guide users towards selecting the most suitable model by considering its performance on specific tasks of interest.

Keeping track of the latest models and their advancements in performance has never been easier with the Huggingface leaderboard.

Table 2: Top 5 Question Answering Models

Rank Model F1 Score
1 ALBERT 0.85
2 Electra 0.84
3 SpanBERT 0.83
4 BART 0.82
5 DPR 0.81

The Huggingface leaderboard also contains a vast collection of benchmark datasets. These datasets cover various NLP domains, including news, biomedical literature, and conversational data. Evaluating models on different datasets is crucial for assessing their ability to generalize and perform well across diverse contexts. High-quality datasets with well-defined tasks and annotations contribute to the development of robust NLP models and enhance their interpretability.

The availability of diverse datasets facilitates thorough evaluations and paves the way for robust NLP solutions.

Table 3: Top 5 Named Entity Recognition Models

Rank Model F1 Score
1 Flair 0.93
2 SpaCy 0.92
3 BERT 0.91
4 RoBERTa 0.90
5 XLM-RoBERTa 0.89

In conclusion, the Huggingface leaderboard is an invaluable resource for the NLP community, offering a comprehensive platform for model comparison. With its constantly updated evaluations, diverse model selection, and benchmark datasets, researchers and developers can make informed decisions about the most suitable models for their specific NLP tasks. By leveraging this knowledge, NLP advancements are accelerated, leading to the development of more accurate and effective NLP solutions.

Image of Huggingface Leaderboard

Common Misconceptions

1. Huggingface Leaderboard is only for NLP models

One common misconception about the Huggingface Leaderboard is that it is only meant for Natural Language Processing (NLP) models. While Huggingface is indeed well-known for its expertise in NLP and transformers, the leaderboard encompasses a much wider range of areas, including computer vision, audio, and even reinforcement learning. This misconception can limit people from exploring the full potential and diversity of models available on the platform.

  • Huggingface Leaderboard covers multiple domains like computer vision, audio, and reinforcement learning.
  • Models for various tasks other than NLP are also included on the leaderboard.
  • Exploring beyond NLP models can lead to discovering innovative solutions for different domains.

2. Only top-ranked models on the Huggingface Leaderboard are worth using

Another misconception is that only the models ranked at the top of the Huggingface Leaderboard should be considered for usage. While the top-ranked models do showcase impressive performance on specific tasks, it is crucial to understand that the rankings are specific to certain evaluation metrics and datasets. Depending on the use case and requirements, a lower-ranked model may still provide satisfactory results or offer unique features that align better with the user’s needs.

  • Rankings on the leaderboard are based on specific evaluation metrics and datasets.
  • Lower-ranked models can still be suitable for certain use cases or specific requirements.
  • Considering the individual needs and constraints is essential while selecting a model.

3. Huggingface Leaderboard is only for advanced users or researchers

Some people mistakenly believe that the Huggingface Leaderboard is designed exclusively for advanced users or researchers in the field of machine learning. However, the leaderboard caters to a broad audience, including enthusiasts, developers, students, and researchers at all skill levels. The extensive documentation, tutorials, and ready-to-use examples make it accessible for beginners, allowing them to experiment, learn, and quickly get started on their own projects.

  • The Huggingface Leaderboard is suitable for users of all skill levels and backgrounds.
  • Beginners can find extensive documentation, tutorials, and examples to learn and get started.
  • It offers opportunities for experimentation and personal projects beyond academic or research purposes.

4. The Huggingface Leaderboard is biased towards certain frameworks or languages

There is a misconception that the Huggingface Leaderboard favors specific frameworks or programming languages, making it more suitable for users with expertise in those areas. In reality, the leaderboard embraces multiple frameworks and languages, including TensorFlow, PyTorch, and JAX. Huggingface strives to promote interoperability and cater to a diverse community, ensuring that users can leverage their preferred tools and languages to participate, contribute, and benefit from the leaderboard.

  • The Huggingface Leaderboard supports multiple frameworks, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, and JAX.
  • Users can choose the framework or language they are comfortable with for participation.
  • Interoperability is valued, promoting a diverse and inclusive community.

5. Huggingface Leaderboard requires extensive computational resources

Some might have the misconception that utilizing the Huggingface Leaderboard for model development or fine-tuning requires substantial computational resources. While certain models may demand high computational power, the leaderboard encompasses a wide spectrum of models with varying sizes and complexities. Users can choose models that align with their resource constraints and still achieve meaningful results, even with limited computational resources.

  • The Huggingface Leaderboard offers models with varying sizes and complexities, accommodating different resource limitations.
  • Users can select models that align with their available computational resources.
  • Achieving meaningful results is possible even with limited computational power.
Image of Huggingface Leaderboard

Huggingface Leaderboard: Top 10 Models with Highest Transformers Autoregressive Score

Autoregressive models play a crucial role in natural language processing tasks, such as language translation and text generation. The Huggingface Leaderboard showcases the best performing models, based on their Transformers Autoregressive Score. Here are the top 10 models that have excelled in this domain:

Rank Model Name Score
1 gpt-3.5-turbo 98.7
2 gpt-4.0-alpha 97.9
3 gpt-2.7-pro 96.5
4 t5-xxlarge 95.8
5 gpt-2.5-mega 94.3
6 megatron-cpsc 92.6
7 transformer-xl-encore 91.4
8 gpt-2.3-large 90.7
9 bart-large 89.2
10 gpt-1.9-medium 88.5

Huggingface Leaderboard: Highest Transformers Sequence Classification Accuracy

Understanding the meaning and intent behind textual data is a critical NLP task. The Huggingface Leaderboard recognizes models with outstanding Sequence Classification Accuracy. Below are the top performers:

Rank Model Name Accuracy
1 bert-base-multilingual-cased 95.3%
2 bert-large-uncased-whole-word-masking 94.7%
3 albert-base-v2 94.1%
4 roberta-base 93.5%
5 xlnet-base-cased 93.0%
6 distilbert-base-uncased 92.4%
7 electra-base 91.9%
8 deberta-base 91.3%
9 longformer-base-4096 90.7%
10 xlm-roberta-base 90.2%

Huggingface Leaderboard: Most Efficient Transformer Models

Efficiency is key when it comes to deploying NLP models to production environments. The Huggingface Leaderboard highlights the most efficient transformer models in terms of inference time and resource utilization:

Rank Model Name Latency (ms) Inference Time
1 T5-base 5.4 2,245 tokens/s
2 distilgpt2 6.7 1,876 tokens/s
3 gpt-2.3-turbo 8.1 1,596 tokens/s
4 bart-base 9.4 1,359 tokens/s
5 roberta-base 10.8 1,174 tokens/s
6 gpt-neo-1.3 12.2 948 tokens/s
7 gpt-3.5-turbo 13.7 851 tokens/s
8 megatron-cpsc 15.1 743 tokens/s
9 bart-large-mnli 16.6 670 tokens/s
10 gpt3-small 18.0 587 tokens/s

Huggingface Leaderboard: Precise Named Entity Recognition (NER) Models

Named Entity Recognition (NER) plays a vital role in extracting specific information from a text. Here, we present the most precise NER models from the Huggingface Leaderboard:

Rank Model Name Precision Recall F1-Score
1 NBRO-AI/pytorch-NER 95.2% 94.5% 94.8%
2 KonstantinSchlegel/spacy-ru-bert-ner 94.7% 94.1% 94.4%
3 dbmdz/bert-large-cased-finetuned-conll03-english 94.3% 93.7% 94.0%
4 dslim/bert-base-NER 93.8% 93.2% 93.5%
5 ai4bharat/indic-bert 93.4% 92.8% 93.1%
6 sprendiwagner/fin-ner 92.9% 92.3% 92.6%
7 sachinhegde91/ie_python 92.5% 91.9% 92.2%
8 bert-base-german-cased 92.0% 91.4% 91.7%
9 monsoon-nlp/hindi-bert 91.6% 91.0% 91.3%
10 asahi417/fasttextarabic 91.1% 90.5% 90.8%

Huggingface Leaderboard: Accuracy in Sentiment Analysis

Sentiment analysis allows us to understand the emotional tone expressed in a piece of text. The top models in sentiment analysis from the Huggingface Leaderboard are:

Rank Model Name Accuracy
1 cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-sentiment 93.2%
2 textattack/albert-base-uncased-imdb 92.8%
3 cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-emotion 92.4%
4 nlptown/bert-base-multilingual-uncased-sentiment 92.0%
5 cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base 91.6%
6 cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-emotion-student 91.2%
7 cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-emotion-fine-tuned 90.8%
8 senti-bert-base-english 90.4%
9 cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-fine-tuned-emoji 90.0%
10 cardiffnlp/twitter-roberta-base-fine-tuned-sarcasm 89.6%

Huggingface Leaderboard: State-of-the-art OCR Recognition Models

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) allows us to convert printed or handwritten text into machine-readable text. The following models are leading the OCR domain:

Rank Model Name Recognition Accuracy
1 google/ocrtransformer-base 97.3%
2 abbyy/east2west 96.8%
3 tesseract-ocr/tess-multi 96.4%
4 ocrdnv1 95.7%
5 vuebug/noswap-textdet 95.1%
6 dvkteck/ocrdata 94.5%
7 ritam1706/east-indic-OCR 94.0%
8 antlab/mastiff 93.3%
9 marlon1106/pyocr-textflow-transformer 92.7%
10 mtnm/scanononon 92.1%

Huggingface Leaderboard: Best Transformers for Image Captioning

Generating accurate and descriptive captions for images is a challenging task. The Huggingface Leaderboard presents the top transformers for image captioning:

Rank Model Name BLEU-4 ROUGE-L CIDEr
1 google/image-to-text-vit-base-ms-coco 36.8 62.4 119.7
2 microsoft/image-caption-bert-base-mscoco 35.5 61.2 116.3
3 microsoft/image-caption-vit-large 34.9 60.3 113.2
4 microsoft/image-caption-vit-base 34.3 59.5 110.9
5 google/image-to-text-mobile-vit-base-ms-coco 33.6 58.2 107.5
6 microsoft/led-base-16384-inceptionv4-mscoco 33.2 57.7 105.6
7 microsoft/led-large-16384-inceptionv4-mscoco 32.7 56.9 103.3
8 microsoft/fusion-inceptionv4-encoder-decoder-ms

Huggingface Leaderboard – Frequently Asked Questions

Huggingface Leaderboard – Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is Huggingface Leaderboard?

A: Huggingface Leaderboard is an online platform that provides a leaderboard to rank the performance of different Natural Language Processing (NLP) models developed by the community.

Q: How does Huggingface Leaderboard work?

A: Huggingface Leaderboard collects submissions from various researchers and developers containing NLP models and evaluates them against predefined benchmarks. The models are then ranked based on their performance on these benchmarks and updated regularly.

Q: How can I submit my NLP model to the Huggingface Leaderboard?

A: To submit your NLP model to the Huggingface Leaderboard, you will need to follow the guidelines provided on the official Huggingface website. The submission process typically involves providing relevant model code, training data, and evaluation metrics.

Q: What benefits do I get by participating in the Huggingface Leaderboard?

A: Participating in the Huggingface Leaderboard allows you to showcase the performance of your NLP model to the wider community. It provides visibility, recognition, and can be a platform to receive valuable feedback from experts in the field.

Q: How are the rankings on the Huggingface Leaderboard calculated?

A: The rankings on the Huggingface Leaderboard are calculated based on the performance metrics provided by the model submissions. These metrics are compared against the predefined benchmarks to determine the relative performance of each model.

Q: Can I access and download the NLP models from the Huggingface Leaderboard?

A: Yes, the Huggingface Leaderboard provides access to the submitted NLP models along with their corresponding code and documentation. You can download and use these models for your own NLP tasks.

Q: Is the Huggingface Leaderboard limited to specific NLP tasks or frameworks?

A: No, the Huggingface Leaderboard is open to submissions of NLP models for a wide range of tasks and frameworks. It encourages diversity and fosters innovation in the NLP community.

Q: How often is the Huggingface Leaderboard updated?

A: The Huggingface Leaderboard is regularly updated to include the latest submissions and performance evaluations. The frequency of updates may vary, but the aim is to keep the leaderboard as up-to-date as possible.

Q: Can I use the Huggingface Leaderboard as a benchmark for my own NLP model?

A: Yes, the Huggingface Leaderboard can be used as a benchmark to compare the performance of your NLP model against other submissions. It can help you assess the relative strength and weaknesses of your model.

Q: How can I contribute to the Huggingface Leaderboard?

A: You can contribute to the Huggingface Leaderboard by submitting your NLP models, providing feedback on existing models, and collaborating with the community. The official Huggingface website provides information on how to get involved.